As such, it makes it difficult to decide how to improve teaching and learning. This measurement type provides less concrete evidence of student learning but can be used in conjunction with direct measures to gain more insight into the impact of the teaching and learning process.
Indirect measures also include data that is related to students, but not directly tied to an outcome e. There is a total of 16 measurable outcomes and a generalized rubric for measuring each. Examples include revising course content in terms of depth vs.
How are the assessments aligned with learning outcomes? What is its intrinsic value in terms of: Knowledge acquired? Skill development? Values clarification? Performance attainment? How are homework and problem sets related to exams? How are the exams related to each other? What other forms of assessment besides exams can be used as indicators of student learning?
If writing assignments are used, are there enough of them for students to develop the requisite skills embedded in them? How is feedback on student work provided to help students improve?
Direct measures require that students demonstrate achievement of learning outcomes. Direct measures imply that there is a product that can be evaluated. The major advantage to course-embedded assessment is student motivation. When assessment takes place within the context of a course, students usually perform at a higher level than if they are simply asked to take a test or demonstrate some ability for assessment purposes alone. Course-embedded assessment is often referred to as "authentic" assessment.
Other advantages to course-embedded assessment include higher response rates and the ability to use the same product for both a course grade and assessment purposes. Skip to main content.
Search terms Search.
0コメント